Help me, Grammar-Wan-Kenobi
Mar. 22nd, 2008 11:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is embarrassing but I figure better now than after the fact. I`m doing a little experiment and writing a fic in present tense so now I`m at a bit of a loss. Writing about past actions when do I use simple past and when do I use the "had done..." version? Anyone? Bueller?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:33 pm (UTC)But you can also use had left
Depends on the sentence structure more than anything else I guess
But thats just me
xxx
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:45 pm (UTC)Not 100% sure though
x
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-25 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-25 07:59 pm (UTC)Hee. I could do an anthology "J2 throughout the ages", it would even be educational. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-25 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-22 11:47 pm (UTC)Have + verb = Continuous action in the past with no definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I have skipped rope in my time."
Had + verb = One action in the past with a definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I had walked to the store, but it was closed."
Present tense writing uses the verb tense differently with different points-of-view:
If you're doing a THIRD-PERSON point of view, you are to be using past-tense verbs, such as "He walkED to the store." (That example is also a good way of fixing the "Had + verb" example for more effective writing...i.e. getting rid of the "to be" verb.)
If you're doing a FIRST-PERSON point of view, you are to be using the present-tense verb, such as "He walkS to the store," or "I walkED to the store."
SECOND-PERSON point of view would be as such, "You walk to the store."
---
Much blah. It's the writing-tutor in me. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:03 am (UTC)Had + verb = One action in the past with a definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I had walked to the store, but it was closed."
So if someone was doing something right now that I write in present tense and their thoughts featured a recollection of a past event, one that is definitely finished I`d use the "he had done so and so"?
And then of course there is past dialogue. *drops dead*
What I never really know what to do with things that "linger", like feelings. Say if I want to establish that person A had a certain effect on person B they would presumably still have, only A and B currently don`t interact so it`s all technically in the past.
Sorry for the grammar bombardment. *g*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:23 am (UTC)If it is the character recollecting without a flashback, yes. But it is even best to leave it out then for effective, clean writing, and just use past tense. You can indicate it was a past event by phrases, such as "remembered." Such as: "As he washed the dishes, he remembered when he went to brunch every Sunday after church." (*reminds self to make examples that make sense*) If that seems too "not-subtle", it is. It's this finesse of writing so the audience knows what time they're reading about.
If it's direct quoting/dialogue, it's iffy. It depends on how you bracket/bookend it with narration or other dialogue:
He stared at the cliff-edge of the water-hole. "I told you it was dangerous," he had said.
I love you, he had said.
I love you, he said once.
Yes, you can use "had/have" for this. Such as: "He had fallen for her/him/shim." However, this feels like the definite past event that may not still be true. Again, it is best to cut the "to be" verb: "He fell for her/him/shim." See how it feels more "lingering"? The audience immediately will ask questions in their heads, like: "Is he still in love?" Because the "had fallen," carries with it the connotation that it is an isolated event in the past, with a definite beginning AND END.
ARGH. Just send whatever to me and I'll edit with you.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 02:08 pm (UTC)Hee. *roped in* I could send you my beginning so you can see what my screw-y brain is trying to get across and in turn my screw-y brain can figure out the underlying principle of the thing. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:21 am (UTC)Past perfect tense (have, had, has been, blah, blah) is really awkward to read and write. If you're going to have a passage about something that happened in the past, usually just the first sentence or two is enough of a transition in past perfect tense, and then I'd use straight past. But, of course, I'm saying this without knowing the context, so I could be waaaay off base.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 02:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 02:03 pm (UTC)Oh, that`s interesting because that`s totally what confused me in reading other fics since in German grammar you can`t jump tenses in a passage that by content belongs together.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-24 12:45 pm (UTC)As for your specific question. Just... past perfect tense is yucky, lol.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 09:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-23 02:00 pm (UTC)Tell me about it. :D