Entry tags:
Help me, Grammar-Wan-Kenobi
This is embarrassing but I figure better now than after the fact. I`m doing a little experiment and writing a fic in present tense so now I`m at a bit of a loss. Writing about past actions when do I use simple past and when do I use the "had done..." version? Anyone? Bueller?
no subject
But you can also use had left
Depends on the sentence structure more than anything else I guess
But thats just me
xxx
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Have + verb = Continuous action in the past with no definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I have skipped rope in my time."
Had + verb = One action in the past with a definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I had walked to the store, but it was closed."
Present tense writing uses the verb tense differently with different points-of-view:
If you're doing a THIRD-PERSON point of view, you are to be using past-tense verbs, such as "He walkED to the store." (That example is also a good way of fixing the "Had + verb" example for more effective writing...i.e. getting rid of the "to be" verb.)
If you're doing a FIRST-PERSON point of view, you are to be using the present-tense verb, such as "He walkS to the store," or "I walkED to the store."
SECOND-PERSON point of view would be as such, "You walk to the store."
---
Much blah. It's the writing-tutor in me. ;)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Past perfect tense (have, had, has been, blah, blah) is really awkward to read and write. If you're going to have a passage about something that happened in the past, usually just the first sentence or two is enough of a transition in past perfect tense, and then I'd use straight past. But, of course, I'm saying this without knowing the context, so I could be waaaay off base.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)