astri13 | (no subject)

There was tiny spoiler or rather non-spoiler? How do you call it when something is said NOT to happen? in the latest Ask Aussiello
Usually I wouldn`t bother posting it it`s so insignificant to any plot-issues going on but I LOVE it and I hope it`s true, now and always. Again reading that would likely not give anything away about any plot or real character issues, it`s more an extreme side-thing (though still important to me :)

Question: Do you know if anything will ever happen between Dean and Bela on Supernatural before we run out of new episodes? — Katrina
Ausiello: If by "anything" you mean "knockin' boots," the answer, per series creator Eric Kripke, is no. " Sorry, no Dean-Bela hookups. They hate each other too much. If anything, Bela becomes more antagonistic."

Please, please, please, let that always remain the case. They had Bela do things way too much over the line that I would buy Dean overlooking them - other than giving her the clichéd little redemption. She is near sociopathic, you already half-way write her that way, now drop the cutefying of it and it might actually work. Sociopaths aren`t cute and the heroes don`t think they have "style".

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

but I've read other spoilers that make me far more unhappy than this one could cheer me up. And actually, what I read wasn't so much a spoiler as an episode summary thingee for one of the upcoming episodes.

Yeah well, I`ve generally lowered my expectations this Season - and then some. Sad but true.

I don't think Bela could ever work for this show, no matter what they do or how they do it, though.

She is a character that shouldn`t be in more than at the most 3 episodes a Season because she is so tangential to anything. I mean it makes sense that people make money of the Supernatural but in the nitty-gritty world of hunters and demon wars it makes less sense to see them.

There was a character on Firefly - Saffron - who appeared twice and was a kind of con-artist and she worked.
However it seems they`re going the Vala-route and didn`t even bother to get Claudia Black.

Yeah well, I`ve generally lowered my expectations this Season - and then some. Sad but true.

Yeah. I meant as far as how they plan to use Bela on the show.

I don't think Bela should be on this show at all, even for one episode. *g*

However it seems they`re going the Vala-route and didn`t even bother to get Claudia Black.

Yep. And that ruined SG-1 for me completely. I never watched all of the last season and I have no interest in the movies coming out. It made me dislike Daniel to the point where I can't even watch the earlier seasons that I used to love--at least not most of the time. They ruined him as a character for me.

And that's with Claudia Black playing the part. She was amazing, and fun to watch and I loved her and had a massive girl-crush on her. *g* That alone kept me from tuning out even sooner.

Lauren C. is no Claudia Black, and this type of character is one that I really can't stand on any show. As with SG-1, though, it's even more what it does to Dean than just her presence, though on this show, her presence (and the presence of all the other guest characters--too much focus on everyone and everything but Sam and Dean and too much separation of Sam and Dean) also bothers me.

Ah well... *g*