ext_17016 ([identity profile] kentawolf.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] astri13 2008-03-22 11:47 pm (UTC)

Well, it's best in general, for more effective writing, to leave out the "to be" verb (is, has, had) whenever you can. Such as: rewriting the sentence. So, for example: "He had done it" can be transformed into "He did it."

Have + verb = Continuous action in the past with no definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I have skipped rope in my time."

Had + verb = One action in the past with a definite beginning and ending. Such as: "I had walked to the store, but it was closed."

Present tense writing uses the verb tense differently with different points-of-view:
If you're doing a THIRD-PERSON point of view, you are to be using past-tense verbs, such as "He walkED to the store." (That example is also a good way of fixing the "Had + verb" example for more effective writing...i.e. getting rid of the "to be" verb.)

If you're doing a FIRST-PERSON point of view, you are to be using the present-tense verb, such as "He walkS to the store," or "I walkED to the store."

SECOND-PERSON point of view would be as such, "You walk to the store."

---

Much blah. It's the writing-tutor in me. ;)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting